The main reason St-Pierre was acquitted was because the victim repeatedly lied about her age to make him believe she was 18. This “support” is payment for sexual services. “No need to hide the facts,” Compagnone said. But when they met, it was mostly to determine if they have “chemistry.” The “sugar daddy” was ready to financially “support” a “sugar baby” for up to $2,000 per month as part of their relationship. She also understands that she may have to have sexual contact with these men,” Compagnone wrote in her June 18 decision.įrom the start, St-Pierre had sexual contact with the teenager. “Attracted by the possibility of making a quick buck, she agrees to meet men much older than her through the site. The 15-year-old – who said she is 18 on her profile – is “looking for a sugar daddy.” It is not her first time as a “sugar baby.” She had already met three other men through the platform. St-Pierre contacts the victim on the website. The 52-year-old Montrealer was accused of buying the sexual services of a minor, sexual assault, possession of child pornography and drug trafficking.ĭecember 2018. This is how Judge Patricia Compagnone described Bruno St-Pierre’s case in his acquittal last June. But above all, it is an unfortunate illustration of the “disturbing trivialization of prostitution and the glorification of the commodification of male-female relations.” MONTREAL - It’s the story of a 15-year-old teenager who lied to make a quick buck and a “sugar daddy” willing to “support” a “sugar baby” for sex.

Sugar daddy websites for teens